By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
foej.infoej.in
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Polity
  • FOEJ Original
  • Culture
  • Human Rights
  • Videos
  • More
    • Environment
    • World
    • Business
Search
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Supreme Court Stays Rahul Gandhi’s Defamation Conviction
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Latest News
Mob Lynching in Chhapra: One Dead, One Critical, Over Cow Allegation
FOEJ Original Latest Mob Lynching
China’s Strategic Alignment with Pakistan in the 2025 India-Pakistan Conflict
International Latest Opinion
Cancerous, dangerous: Madhya Pradesh HC orders FIR against BJP minister for reference to Colonel Sofiya Qureshi
India Latest
Another Muslim Man Granted Bail in Jharkhand ‘Al-Qaeda’ Case: A Pattern of Wrongful Detentions?
Uncategorized
India Reopens 32 Airports Following Ceasefire Agreement with Pakistan
International Latest
Aa
foej.infoej.in
Aa
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Polity
  • FOEJ Original
  • Culture
  • Human Rights
  • Videos
  • More
Search
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Polity
  • FOEJ Original
  • Culture
  • Human Rights
  • Videos
  • More
    • Environment
    • World
    • Business
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
foej.in > Blog > Politics > Supreme Court Stays Rahul Gandhi’s Defamation Conviction
Politics

Supreme Court Stays Rahul Gandhi’s Defamation Conviction

FOEJ DESK
Last updated: 2023/08/04 at 11:30 AM
FOEJ DESK
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

Aug 04, 2023: The Supreme Court has granted a stay on the conviction of Rahul Gandhi in a criminal defamation case related to his “Modi surname” remark made during an election rally in 2019

This decision allows the revival of his Lok Sabha membership and opens the path for him to contest the upcoming national elections.

Justice BR Gavai, who pronounced the verdict, highlighted that the impact of Gandhi’s conviction is significant, as it affects the rights of the electorates who voted for him.

The Court highlighted in its order that it was expected from the trial judge to give reasons for imposing two years of punishment for a non-cognizable offence.

The court stated that “No specific reason has been granted by the trial judge to impose a maximum sentence apart from a comment by this Court. Had the sentence been even a day lesser, the provisions (pertaining to disqualification) would not have applied. Learned trial judge was at least expected to give reasons for imposing maximum sentence for not cognizable offence.”

According to the Bar and Bench, Justice Gavai stated that “One of the factors is .. if a constituency in parliament goes unrepresented, is it not a ground? There is no whisper by the trial judge for the need to impose the maximum sentence. You are not only affecting the rights of one individual but an entire electorate of a constituency.”

“No reason has been given by the trial judge for imposing maximum sentence, the order of conviction needs to be stayed pending final adjudication,” the bench said.

Gandhi had, in his speech, linked Prime Minister Narendra Modi with fugitives like Nirav Modi and Lalit Modi. He had said, “Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi, Narendra Modi. How come all the thieves have ‘Modi’ as a common surname?”

Gandhi had been earlier disqualified from parliament after his conviction in the case.

“We are of the considered view that the ramifications of the ruling are wide, and affect the rights of his constituency’s electorate. Considering the aforesaid and particularly that no reasons have been given by the trial judge for maximum sentence which has incurred disqualification, order of conviction needs to be stayed pendency of proceedings,” the top court ordered.

The case was filed by Purnesh Modi, a former minister in the Gujarat government, and had resulted in Gandhi’s disqualification from parliament. However, with the recent court order, Gandhi’s membership in the Lok Sabha from Wayanad would be restored.

Gandhi was convicted under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. Under Section 500 the individual can be punished with simple imprisonment for two years with or without fine for defaming the other person.

FOEJ DESK August 4, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Previous Article Trump Pleads Not Guilty to US Election Conspiracy Charges in Court Appearance
Next Article Lok Sabha Clears Defence Bill to Boost ‘Theaterisation’, Rajnath Singh Hails it as ‘Historic-Reform’
foej.infoej.in
Follow US

© 2023 Foundation For Ethical Journalism. All Rights Reserved.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?